I’ve spent some $$$ on craft cocktails in dimly lit rooms filled with vintage speakers and rare records, yet I’m far from a "vinyl head." In these listening bars, there is a feeling that you need to be an expert just to exist in the space. We usually think of these lounges as being only about the sound, but what if the music is actually secondary to the overall system? This is an exploration of how sound, taste, time, and space work together to shape our mood.

We tend to think of taste as a closed-loop system between the mouth and the nose, but the physiological reality is far more "wired." There’s a new frontier of sensory design. We are seeing the collapse of the wall between what we hear and what we consume. Products like the Lollipop Star are turning candy into a hardware device, using bone-conduction to play music through your teeth while you taste the flavor.

This piece started as a question I kept circling back to: is nostalgia really about memory, or is it about how things looked? Before you remember what was happening, you remember how it looked. A good example to reflect on this is with technology. The more I paid attention to it (old cameras, colorful computers, foldable phones) the more it felt like sight comes first. We don’t just remember what things did, we remember the glow, the grain, the way a device moved or sat in a room. This is me thinking out loud about why visual design keeps returning, and what that says about how we remember, choose, and feel around technology now.

This essay traces how color in technology shifted from function to identity, from authority to atmosphere. What began as a visual language for safety and system state evolved into personal expression, then disappeared under professional minimalism and optimization. Today, color is re-emerging as presence. Through objects, interfaces, and spaces, technology is learning how to be seen again, signaling a quieter, more human relationship between design, vision, and experience.

Every January, CES shows us where technology is headed: innovators, media, and decision-makers sharing what they've been building and what they think we'll want next. I looked through 400+ products and organized them across eight perceptual systems: sight, sound, touch, taste, scent, space, time, and system. What stood out was a pattern: these devices aren't just responding to how we live, they're learning how we sense. That shift feels worth noticing.

“Wait… this actually works.” Cécred. K18. I know you've watched those kind of videos. And I don’t think that reaction is random. For years, Black hair care leaned on oils and promises. “Skinification” changes that. It means treating the scalp like skin using proven actives, understanding biology, and repairing hair at a molecular level. When products are built this way, results should be guaranteed. This shift toward science-driven formulas truly excites me. Let's talk about all the innovation.

A couple years ago, my skin was going through it; severe acne, hyperpigmentation. I spent months following estheticians online, doing facials, learning what to use for what, trying to decode my own skin. I spent a lot on Dermalogica & some other derm-based $$$ products. My skin cleared. When my routine became maintenance, not prescriptive, I discovered K-beauty. Great ingredients, simple formulations, feels good touch and put on the skin. Quality and cost found equilibrium. (Image from Dermalogica)

Beauty was never meant to be discovered through a screen alone. It’s tactile. When beauty education majorly moved online, touch disappeared and was replaced by comparison and fatigue. Brands are rebuilding experience through stores and events, while creators gain access through PR and trips. The luxury isn’t the product anymore, it’s being chosen to experience the creation story.

The global perfume market is undergoing a technological revolution. IBM's Philyra has analyzed over two million fragrance formulas. Tom Ford’s 2025 Fragrance of the Year was AI-assisted. From Google → Osmo's neural networks mapping molecular structure to scent, to EEG headsets predicting fragrance preferences, to deep learning models optimizing how perfumes evolve through space and time. This piece explores how advanced technologies are reshaping perfumery while preserving its artistry.

Long before formal math, Tapputi of Mesopotamia was already experimenting with scent. Around 1200 BCE, she distilled flowers, adjusted ingredients, and tested how perfumes evolved on skin and made people feel over time. What she understood intuitively is what we now call the three acts of perfume: the first impression, the heart you live in, and the memory that lingers. We still experiment the same way today, through layering and building scent wardrobes for different moods and moments. Perfumery was one of our earliest systems: input ingredients, test combinations, optimize for feeling.

Pistachio perfumes were everywhere in 2025. But the sweet, dessert-style scent trend is starting to change. Perfumers are looking to experiment more with fresher, more savory smells. It feels a lot like what’s happening in food right now. There’s also an interesting angle on the reduction in appetite and turning to food-smelling perfumes. This piece looks at how food trends turn into fragrance trends, and what that means for what we’ll be smelling in 2026.

Dining in 2026 is all about the experience. I gathered data from top industry reports (OpenTable, EHL, AF&CO. + Carbonate, dsm-firmenich, and more) to break down what's actually happening. Experiential dining is up 46%. People are paying for the story, the interaction, the memory. Flights of everything, one-hit-wonder restaurants, prix-fixe menus; people want to sample & explore. And discovery is shifting: Reddit is now the #2 site by search traffic, & 44% of people plan to use AI for restaurant discovery. Here's everything you need to know about where dining is headed next year.

People are choosing trips based on how they want to feel, and that’s really what the experience economy 2.0 looks like. In this guide, I pulled insights from the biggest travel and hospitality reports for 2026 and broke down everything from high-energy trips like Rio Carnival, World Cup, and Detty December in Lagos to emerging spots like the Red Sea, Phu Quoc, and the Faroe Islands. You’ll find ideas for solo travel, beaches and wellness, food-focused trips, rare events like the 2026 solar eclipse, and more. If you’re planning travel next year, start here.

Something fundamental has shifted in how consumers measure value. It's no longer about what you buy, it's about what you feel. Across industries from fragrance to hospitality, from fine dining to beauty retail, I derived that experience value equals emotional impact divided by time spent. Welcome to the Experience Economy 2.0, where brands across sectors are shifting from products and services to holistic sensory experiences that engage emotions, memories, and multiple senses simultaneously.

In my last post, I wrote about how how brands now design for how we spend time with them, not just what we buy. The attention/creator economy has turned time into a sense of its own: something you feel, allocate, and remember. So in this post, I’m introducing the Ode Experience, a way of planning around time as a sense. And I’ll use Japan, a trip I planned with two friends, to show how this plays out. The experiences that stay with us are the ones where time is intentionally shaped & the Ode Experience is simply time well spent.

I’ve been thinking about time as a kind of diagnostic tool, a way to understand the moment we’re living in. If future time = present time + (Δt × signal strength), then the future isn’t somewhere ahead of us. It’s here... but blurry. Lists like Forbes 30 Under 30 are one of those signals. This year’s top cities (NY, SF, LA, Boston, Chicago) map almost perfectly onto the places with the highest AI job density + the strongest builder/creator ecosystems. Even the funding tells its own story: $3.8B distributed across 600 honorees. Time leaves traces of signals to anticipate & I’ll dive deeper into the data.

I was wondering, if the “Imagine if…” spaces ever became real, where would they appear first? Probably in the cities that already have the tech, density, and money to support them. And that’s the real point, just like some places have bad physical UX, some have bad digital UX. The new digital divide is about AI: where you live now shapes what tools you can use, what jobs you can access, and whether you can compete at all. There are a handful of “hotspots,” creating pressure on community, relationships, and affordability. This shift affects where we live, which properties hold value, and how invisible digital systems are quietly shaping opportunity.

What if the spaces we already use every day were redesigned for connection instead of efficiency? Imagine AMC theaters turning into culture rooms for watch parties, Trader Joe’s adding tasting lounges, gyms creating cooldown cafés, or museums offering sketch-friendly community hours. Picture Sephora running free beauty classes again, Spotify opening listening lounges, or Discord hosting IRL local servers for gaming and board games. None of these require building new infrastructure; just rethinking what’s already there.

I came to Pittsburgh for grad school and somehow I'm still here. The city revolves around sports bars, hockey, football: none of it my vibe. Making friends feels like playing chess as an amateur. The demographics skew older & non “me” in ways that make connecting harder. The infrastructure doesn't help. Houston’s similar... people basically live 40 mins apart. NY has access, but every trip is a mission. Urban design is interface design. Some cities are cognitively expensive: car-dependent, confusing, spatially stressful. Bad planning is a daily tax on relationships, activities, access. Let’s talk about it.

My last post shared my personal experience with disappearing third places. This one looks at the data. Using the National Neighborhood Data Archive (NaNDA), I analyzed three decades of establishment trends across U.S. neighborhoods where people could eat, shop, exercise, and gather from 1990 to 2021. The dataset shows which spaces grew, which collapsed, and where access declined. It also reveals a clear pattern: America’s social infrastructure shifted, segmented, and became more paywalled.